What was the view of mill about India?

How did James Mill view India? Answer: James Mill did not cherish any positive idea about India. He was of the opinion that all Asian societies were at a lower level of civilisation than Europe. According to his telling of history, before the British came to India, the Hindu and the Muslim despots ruled the country.

What was James Mills opinion about British rule in India?

James Mill argued that Hindu and Muslim period of Indian history was characterised by backwardness, where people were imbued in superstitions, orthodoxy and social taboos. That period of history witnessed despotic rule. British rule according to Mill could bring about modernisation and progress in the country.

THIS IS INTERESTING:  Frequent question: Is North India poor?

What did James Mill believe?

He was prominent as a representative of philosophical radicalism, a school of thought also known as Utilitarianism, which emphasized the need for a scientific basis for philosophy as well as a humanist approach to politics and economics. His eldest son was the celebrated Utilitarian thinker John Stuart Mill.

What was the opinion of James Mill about the residents?

Answer: James Mill was one of those who attacked the Orientalists. He was of the opinion that Indians should be made familiar with the scientific and technical advances that the West had made, rather than with the poetry and sacred literature of the Orient.

What is your opinion about James Mill Periodisation?

The problem with the periodization of Indian history by James Mill is that he divided the Indian history into Hindu, Muslim and the British period. It has been argued by many historians that it is not correct to periodize Indian history on the basis of the religion of the rulers.

How did James Mill Categorise the history of India?

In his massive three-volume work, A History of British India, James Mill divides Indian history into three periods – Hindu, Muslim and British. … A variety of faiths, apart from Hinduism and Islam, existed in the periods categorised as Hindu and Muslim by Mill.

What was James Mill view about India?

How did James Mill view India? Answer: James Mill did not cherish any positive idea about India. He was of the opinion that all Asian societies were at a lower level of civilisation than Europe. According to his telling of history, before the British came to India, the Hindu and the Muslim despots ruled the country.

THIS IS INTERESTING:  Why is Indian meditation important?

How did James Mill described the history of British India?

According to historian Thomas Trautmann, “James Mill’s highly influential History of British India (1817) – most particularly the long essay ‘Of the Hindus’ comprising ten chapters – is the single most important source of British Indophobia and hostility to Orientalism.” In the chapter titled “General Reflections in ‘ …

What were the views of James Mill about the Orientalist?

James Mill was one of those who attacked the Orientalist. The British effort, he declared, should not be to teach what the natives wanted, or what they respected, in order to please them and ‘win a place in their heart. ‘ The aim of education ought to be to teach what was useful and practical.

Why did James Mill and Thomas Michael think that European education was essential in India?

James Mill and Thomas Macaulay thought that European education would enable Indians to recognise the advantages that flow from the expansion of trade and commerce and make them see the importance of developing the resources of the country.

What was the idea of James Mill regarding education?

It is practical and political, and one of the first statements about secularism in education and the need to provide primary schooling for all in England. Mr Burston’s introduction relates the two pieces to Mill’s general intellectual and philosophical position, and to the historical context in which he wrote.

What do you know about James Mill?

James Mill (1773–1836) was a Scots-born political philosopher, historian, psychologist, educational theorist, economist, and legal, political and penal reformer. Well-known and highly regarded in his day, he is now all but forgotten. Mill’s reputation now rests mainly on two biographical facts.

THIS IS INTERESTING:  Quick Answer: Who wrote Hindu Dharma?

What is the periodisation of Indian history that James Mill offers?

Answer. James Mill divided Indian history into three periods – Hindu, Muslim and British. This periodisation has its own problem. It is difficult to refer to any period of history as ‘Hindu’ or ‘Muslim’ because a variety of faiths existed simultaneously in these periods.

Why was James Mill’s periodisation unacceptable by the Indian historians?

It was not accepted by Indian historians because it did not provide a complete view on everyone. James Mill divided Indian history into three parts: Hindu, Muslim and British. This periodisation does not help use understand the lives of other minority.

What is the problem with the periodisation of Indian history that James Mill offers short answer?

The problem with the periodisation of Indian History that James Mill offers is the superiority of British shown over Hindu and Muslim. James Mill has put Indian History into three periods – Hindu, Muslim and British, claiming that it was necessary to introduce European manners, arts, institutions and laws in India.