Which of these best describes the outcome of the Indian Removal Act?

What was the outcome of the Indian Removal Act?

In 1830, he signed the Indian Removal Act, which gave the federal government the power to exchange Native-held land in the cotton kingdom east of the Mississippi for land to the west, in the “Indian colonization zone” that the United States had acquired as part of the Louisiana Purchase.

What was the result of the Indian Removal Act quizlet?

The Indian Removal Act was signed into law in 1830. The law granted unsettled lands west of the Mississippi to Native Americans in exchange for their land with pre-existing borders. … The result of the refusal of the Seminole Indians to abandon their land in Florida.

Which statement best describes the 1830 Indian Removal Act?

Which statement best describes the Indian Removal Act of 1830? The act forcibly relocated eastern American Indians to Indian Territory west of the Mississippi River. The act forcibly removed territory from the Cherokee and auctioned it off to prospectors.

Which of the following best describes the purpose of the Indian Removal Act?

Which of the following best describes the Indian Removal Act of 1830? it gave the federal government the power to remove Indians to designated territory west of the Mississippi river.

THIS IS INTERESTING:  Your question: Which dog is used in Indian Army?

What did the Indian Removal Act require?

What did the Indian Removal Act require? … It required that all Americans Indians east Mississippi River would move to lands farther west. Black Hawk’s War was the result.

Which statement is true about Indian removal in the 1820s and 1830s?

Which statement is true about Indian removal in the 1820s and 1830s? The increasing profitability of cotton motivated the United States to intensify efforts to seize Cherokee, Creek, Chickasaw, and Choctaw lands in order to expand cotton cultivation.

Why was the Indian Removal Act a good thing?

Native American removal would reduce conflict between the federal and state governments. It would allow white settlers to occupy more of the South and the West, presumably protecting from foreign invasion. … By separating them from whites, Native Americans would be free from the power of the U.S. government.

Who benefited from the Indian Removal Act?

Most white Americans supported the Removal Act, especially southerners who were eager to expand southward. Expansion south would be good for the country and the future of the country’s economy with the later introduction of cotton production in the south.

Which best describes Jackson’s argument in support of Indian Removal?

In 1830, just a year after taking office, Jackson pushed a new piece of legislation called the “Indian Removal Act” through both houses of Congress. It gave the president power to negotiate removal treaties with Indian tribes living east of the Mississippi.