What is the problem with James Mill periodisation of Indian history?

The problem with the periodisation of Indian history by James Mill is that he divided the Indian history into Hindu, Muslim and the British period. It has been argued by many historians that it is not correct to periodise the Indian history on the basis of religion of the rulers.

What is the problem with the periodisation of Indian history that James Mill offer Class 8?

The problem with the periodisation of Indian History that James Mill offers is the superiority of British shown over Hindu and Muslim. James Mill has put Indian History into three periods – Hindu, Muslim and British, claiming that it was necessary to introduce European manners, arts, institutions and laws in India.

THIS IS INTERESTING:  What are the major problems of Indian roads Class 10?

Why is James Mill’s periodization of Indian history not acceptable to many people?

It was not accepted by Indian historians because it did not provide a complete view on everyone. James Mill divided Indian history into three parts: Hindu, Muslim and British. This periodisation does not help use understand the lives of other minority.

How did James Mill divided Indian history class 8?

In 1817, James Mill, a Scottish economist and political philosopher, published a massive three-volume work, A History of British India. In this he divided Indian history into three periods – Hindu, Muslim and British. This periodisation came to be widely accepted.

What was the limitations of the periodisation offered by James Mill?

It was not accepted by Indian historians because it did not provide a complete view on everyone. James Mill divided Indian history into three parts: Hindu, Muslim and British. This periodisation does not help use understand the lives of other minority.

What evil practices according to James Mill dominated the Indian social life before the British came to India?

Answer. According to James Mill, the evil practices that dominated to the Indian social life were religious intolerance, caste taboos and superstitious practices.

Why did historians find this periodisation unacceptable?

It was not correct to periodise mediaeval India as Muslim History because people belonging to different faiths existed during this time. Such periodisation which was based on the religion of the rulers suggests that the lives, practices and culture of the other people do not matter.

How the periodisation done by James Mill differ from other historians?

Answer: periodisation done by James mill consisted of division of time period on the basis of religion whereas other historians divided history on the basis of social, political, cultural and economic development.

THIS IS INTERESTING:  Which is the most powerful weapon in Hindu mythology?

Why do you feel the periodisation does not apply to India?

However, the periodisation of Indian history based only on religion is problematic for several reasons. A variety of faiths, apart from Hinduism and Islam, existed in the periods categorised as Hindu and Muslim by Mill. Also, it is not right to classify an age according to the religion of the rulers of that time.

What is the problem with the periodisation of Indian history as ancient medieval and modern?

Historians divided Indian History into ancient, medieval and modern. But this classification has its own problems. This periodisation is borrowed from the West where modern period is associated with the growth and development sciences, rationalism, humanism, logic, freedom and equality.

How did James Mill categorize the history of India what was wrong with this kind of Categorisation?

Jame Mill charectorise history of India into three periods I.e Hindu, Muslim and British . This periodisation has its own problem. It is difficult to characterize an age through religion of rulers as variety of faiths existed simultaneously in these periods. what it shows that faiths of people is not important.

Why do we try and divide history into different periods Class 8?

We divide history into different periods to understand the events easily. If we divide it into periods than it will be easier for us to remember the events for different period of different kings. History is not small, It’s so big that’s why it’s impossible the remember each and every event is every king, etc.

THIS IS INTERESTING:  How is Hindu different from Buddhist art?

What is periodisation Why is it useful?

Periodization is the process of study of categorizing the past into discrete, quantified named blocks of time in order to facilitate the study and analysis of history. This results in descriptive abstractions that provide convenient terms for periods of time with relatively stable characteristics.

What was James Mill view about India?

How did James Mill view India? Answer: James Mill did not cherish any positive idea about India. He was of the opinion that all Asian societies were at a lower level of civilisation than Europe. According to his telling of history, before the British came to India, the Hindu and the Muslim despots ruled the country.

What is the meaning of periodisation of history ‘? Who propounded the theory and why was it Criticised by Indian historians?

Answer: James Mill claims that all Asian cultures are less humane than Europe. In its prejudicial view of history, James Mill stated that British rule reflected the elements of development and culture, whereas the pre-British rule portrayed misery and bigotry. apsiganocj and 18 more users found this answer helpful.