How did James Mill divided Indian history explain?

In 1817, James Mill, a Scottish economist and political philosopher, published a massive three-volume work, A History of British India. In this he divided Indian history into three periods – Hindu, Muslim and British. This periodisation came to be widely accepted.

How did James Mill divided Indian history explain Class 8?

James mill divided Indian history into Hinduism and Muslim and British periods. This periodisation is based on the religious line that there was a face for which the Hindu were the rulers and other work ruled. Then came the face of the Muslims and Britishers i.e. Christians.

How do we divide Indian history?

Chronologically, Indian History can be classified into three periods – Ancient India, Medieval India and Modern India.

Why do historians divide history into periods?

Historians divided the past into periods based on the economic and social factors which characterize them. In doing so, they faced two problems. i) Economic and social changes kept taking place hence, boundaries cannot be drawn. ii) The medieval period is compared with the modern period.

THIS IS INTERESTING:  Do Indians study too much?

What is the work of James Mill known as Class 8?

He is known for his famous work “ The History of British India”. Complete Step by Step answer: In his three volumes of work ‘A History of British India’ he divided Indian history into three periods : Hindu, Muslim and the British.

How is history divided explain?

Answer: History is divided is into three distinct ages or periods: Ancient History (3600 B.C.-500 A.D.), the Middle Ages (500-1500 A.D.), and the Modern Age (1500-present).

How did James Mill divided Indian history into 3 parts?

Explanation: James Mill divided history on the basis of religion of the rulers of the times. So, he divided Indian history into three periods: Hindu, Muslim, British.

Why is Indian history divided into periods?

Answer: Historians try and divide history into different periods to capture the characteristics of a particular time. This helps to focus on the central features of a time. This also shows how we see the significance of the change from one period to the next.

How do history and divide the past into periods?

Answer : Historians divide the past into periods based on the economic and social factors which characterize them. … First, economic and social changes keep taking place hence definite boundaries cannot be drawn. Second, these periods are compared with modernity.

Why is it important to divide history?

We divide history into different periods to understand the events easily. If we divide it into periods than it will be easier for us to remember the events for different period of different kings. History is not small, It’s so big that’s why it’s impossible the remember each and every event is every king, etc.

THIS IS INTERESTING:  Who are the Hindu deities?

How do you divide history from periods?

All systems of periodization are arbitrary. The common general split between prehistory, ancient history, Middle Ages, modern history, and contemporary history is a Western division of the largest blocks of time agreed upon by Western historians.

What are James Mill’s thought about Indian civilization and how did he divide Indian history?

He was of the opinion that all Asian societies were at a lower level of civilisation than Europe. According to his telling of history, before the British came to India, the Hindu and the Muslim despots ruled the country. Religious intolerance, caste taboos and superstitious practices dominated social life.

What was James Mill’s contribution to history?

James Mill (born James Milne, 6 April 1773 – 23 June 1836) was a Scottish historian, economist, political theorist, and philosopher. He is counted among the founders of the Ricardian school of economics. He also wrote The History of British India.

How did James Mill categorize the history of India what was wrong with this kind of Categorisation?

Jame Mill charectorise history of India into three periods I.e Hindu, Muslim and British . This periodisation has its own problem. It is difficult to characterize an age through religion of rulers as variety of faiths existed simultaneously in these periods. what it shows that faiths of people is not important.